Some of what is described in this theory 'mirrors' (pardon my pun) the genuine efforts of bodhisattvas. It's been said many times recently, in different contexts, that a bodhisattva's actions are not in any way intended to convert a person to a Buddhist or spiritual path. On the contrary, bodhisattvas completely accord with the person they are with, under the intention of aiding the person in front of them with what they most need as individuals. Under the same token, finding out what a person needs is not about memorizing a philosophy and then passively applying it in conversation with a person. This would be more like the way that some religious groups 'proselytize' with others. It would be more faithful to understanding the bodhisattva path to say that it is about intimately knowing a beings needs before really being able to address them. I think this basic empathy is something that Kohut was also studying in his theories about parent-child relationships that go sour.
I wonder if perhaps, in the eagerness to embrace Buddhist teachings on 'final' enlightenment, people at times overlook the way that persons are often in a state of development. Just what state of development a person is in is really up to the bodhisattva to discover. If I eagerly strive for a total enlightenment in the belief that one size fits all, I will not consider that each sentient being has different needs. I think this is where the practice of empathy becomes such an important tool in spiritual practice. By fully acknowledging another person's stories and meanings, I learn to accept that enlightened being is not about opposing or rejecting phenomena but totally embracing the impermanent, ever changing nature of those appearances. In this way, my body and mind remain relaxed and able to harmonize with any situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment