Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Waldorf's Holes
Steiner’s analogy also made me
realize how much we speak through holes, not through the threads previously
created. The world is now covered with every possible network of communication
and transportation, to the point where I can communicate to someone thousands
of miles away in less than a second. Someone recently was remarking to me that
they could not live without Skype or the technologies that keep people close
and in contact. Yet still, there is a need for spaces and gaps, for holes, and
for mysteries. With Facebook, I see that our contact with people seems closer
and easier than it ever was before. But we often don’t engage the person at
all, only passive images on facebook. The mind works in this way. I see the
image of my friend or colleague on facebook, and then I think that I must be
connecting with that friend. From the image, I can tell where this friend has
gone, but can I tell where they are now?
Facebook is an example of a network that builds images, but it’s still
not alive. It doesn’t breathe or live. It doesn’t have awareness. But it looks
to be aware, because we populate it with mind’s artifacts: laughter, desire,
the traces of happiness, a good meal, an already eaten meal, a controversy, a
petition, a snag, a bad day, a happy face icon. It can confuse me to know, who
am I interfacing with? Do these images and emoticons have an ability to be
aware, as much as I imagine they do?
Perhaps the good news is that social media can lead people to reflect on
how salient images really are, if people are curious to go there. Has anybody
thought to uncover what the images of facebook say about people’s motivations?
For example, what motivates a person to state on Facebook that they are going
to change their diet “Starting from today?” Why is there a need to declare this
decision? What is behind it? What is powerful about images that it increases my
resolve to do something or change my lifestyle? Steiner’s metaphors of the
holes in the fabric reminds me of the need to keep questioning the fabric
itself.
Steiner’s analogy also relates to the mind. In a sense, the mind does not
get snared in any fabric. Even if fabrics of thought was so dense, it wouldn’t
affect my basic ability to be aware. The Surangama Sutra mentions the analogy
of seeing in the dark. If I cover my eyes, I may think I am seeing nothing, but
what is it that allows me to conclude that I see darkness? The awareness hasn’t
left, even if I cannot claim to see anything clearly.
References
Steiner,Rudolph
(1995), The Spiritof the Waldorf School.
Hudson,NY: Anthroposophic Press
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment