I remember reading a book many
years ago, Ian Suttie’s Origins of Love
and Hate. The book talks about how
development for children typically involves making them feel independent and
toughening them so that they don’t rely on maternal love to survive and get
along in the world. What comes out of this is a total reaction against tender
feelings, in favor of an aesthetic of machismo, or toughness. As children, many
of us are taught to think that it is wrong to feel tenderness, because doing so
elicits the same dynamics of ‘co-dependence’ that keep us behind in our
development into adults. We have a million derogatory words for this presumably
co-dependent tenderness. And somehow, particularly for men, there is a sense
that we don’t quite connect maturity with the ability to have softer feelings,
whether for ourselves or for other beings. In order to “mature”, we have to
repress the original maternal bond and become a little bit desensitized.
From the
perspective I have read in Chan Buddhism, I think that the attempt to cut off
tenderness is similar to seeking a certain state of being and rejecting others.
When Gautama Buddha first practiced asceticism, he also seemed to opt for a
tough approach on himself, by fasting and denying himself the basic pleasures
or sustenance of life. It was only later that he arrived at a middle path
between indulgence and total asceticism. In many ways, all human beings are
raised to be a little bit ascetic. When I suffer the hurt or pain of a
frustrated wish, my first impulse is to simply cut off the wish and the source
of the wish as well. Another example: a
friend of mine was explaining to me how she wanted to delete her Facebook account
because she found it so addictive to keep going back to it. I asked her why she
found it addictive, but she could not find a reason. Rather than going into an
understanding of what draws her to Facebook, my friend prefers to have nothing
to do with it. But without understanding the original craving, it is easy for
it to come back in a different form, such as an attachment to texting or some
other mobile application. I explained to my friend: I may have a craving for
ice cream, but would that make me want to cut off my mouth? I think the extreme
of asceticism would be trying to dissociate from the emotion altogether, rather
than embracing its source.
Meditation
practice is often the choice between asceticism and embracing an experience.
Asceticism corresponds to trying to deny that pain or other emotions exist, by ‘focusing’
exclusively on the method of practice. This gets me a little bit of the way,
but not very far. It is because when I meditate, I start to see the limits of
trying to suppress emotions, whereas in daily life, I might not recognize such
limits. When not distracted, pain can seem much greater, so meditative practice
seems to require a very different turning toward the pain. Krishnamurti has
described a kind of meditation where the emotion is seen as inseparable from ‘me’.
But how is this accomplished? I am not always successful at this. At times, I
think that one has to imagine some being that is large enough to contain all
the suffering in the universe. But that ‘contain’ is not just about absorbing
the suffering, the way the ocean absorbs poison. I think that there needs to be
a genuine attitude of interest, rather than trying to deny the sensation
altogether. Christ is an example of a being who seemed to have embodied all
human suffering into his own physical body, and this often helps people to
manage pain. Why is the image and center of Christ powerful? I think it is powerful
because there is no pretending that pain doesn’t exist. Pain becomes manifested
in the body image of Christ rather than being completely non-existent or simply
unseen. Another reason is that the pain is turned to and embraced rather than
cast out prematurely. It is only in facing the pain that one can let go of it or see its impermanence.
During
meditation tonight, I tried to adopt an attitude of genuine concern for the
pain. And I found that this genuine concern was not attached to anything in
particular. It was a sort of loving interest in how the body was doing and an
attitude of solicitude. I found that when I can do this in a genuine way that
is not straining or trying to embody an impossible ideal, it is not so
distracting. I am not struggling with my emotions, and it is much easier to
calm the mind. And I am not trying to use a blanket concept to ‘get rid of’ any
experience I have.
No comments:
Post a Comment