I decide to walk along Don Mills
after work, to meet my friend and colleague at a restaurant. It feels good not
to be indoors or inside a bus. The ground appears to have the remnants of an
earlier rain-shower, now evaporating into a hazy mist. I gaze out past the
bridge at the ensuing traffic. The cars are going down the same road that they
always have. But are they the same cars, and is it for the same reasons? I feel
a sense of freedom that comes from surrendering the tightness of my body and
the feeling of being obligated to other beings.
I want to explore one of the most
perplexing contradictions in my life, namely between the desire to belong) and
the freedom of being alone. In fact, there is no real ‘contradiction’ at all.
But there are certain kinds of attachments there. Too much belonging can lead
to a very mechanical existence of trying to keep up with those around me. It
becomes like me comparing myself to other people and being afraid of falling
behind from them. The irony is that the more I wish to belong with others, the narrower
my existence becomes. In the effort to keep up with the things that might make
me agreeable to others, I lose my inner passions. But I also end up fearing the
loss of others, particularly those from whom I am somehow borrowing passions. I
sometimes have compared this to the moon reflecting the sun’s light.
Some people have suggested the
alternative to be a kind of rugged individualism. There are people who are so
into their own creativity that it overshadows their need for the companionship
of others. Thoreau is perhaps a paradigmatic case of the self-made person. But
even Thoreau acknowledged his connection to the natural world, perhaps more so
than other people.
I start to sense, in fact, that
both ‘the need to belong’ and ‘the need to be alone’ are attachments to false
concepts. Belonging is the attachment to
the concept of merger, which never fully happens in the end. At the end of the
day, I go home as me (or a temporary version of me) and you go home as you. We
have different experiences, and there is no way of saying that we see the same
things. Not only that, but it is never possible to make an impression on
everyone all the time, so the effort to belong all the time is rather futile.
We have to be able to allow others to have their shining moments as well, which
requires surrendering the sense of always being approved or recognized.
On the other hand, total ‘solitude’
is also illusory, because there is no such thing as a single solitary being. We
are always being with or among other beings. But the real problem is that I don’t
really know from one moment to the next who I will be and in what configuration,
so I try to seek a very clear and certain sense of myself. But is that clarity ever
possible? I have heard many people talk about being “secure within themselves”,
but I wonder what this experience really refers to. The closest I can get to it
is a sense that, no matter what happens to us, all is okay in the universe.
This might be described as the sense that some fundamental part of us is being
taken care of. I don’t need to ‘make myself’ any more than a tree needs to make
itself grow. And we can’t measure growth in any other way except in terms of
the thing itself. To try to use a yardstick to describe a tree’s development is
already deviating from the tree’s unique tree-ness.
By denying both total belonging
and total separation, I try to suggest that each moment is a creative merger
around these themes. They are almost two different forces that spin around us
(centri-pedal and centrifugal), and one can only stop to wonder how they
combine and recombine at various moments in life. For example, there are times when I am very
gregarious around people and get lots of energy being around great
conversation, while there are other times when I feel completely shut down and
unable to connect. When I ‘shut down’,
what is this really expressing? Is it the unrequited desire to feel recognized
by others, or is it the defiant desire to move away from all company? As I say
this, I recognize that for the most part, I am not in control of this much of
the time. But I can see the spectrum of emotions without saying that one is me
and the other is not me. Both belonging and separation are familiar to my
being. But are they my whole being?
No comments:
Post a Comment