Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Between One Life and The Next...

After the meditation today, a very accomplished practitioner and friend had shared with me about her coming retirement, and the mixed feelings that it evokes for her to go from a state of having work to doing other things, including spiritual and teaching-related projects. She compared this experience with the practice of letting go, and preparing even for one’s own death. I was quite touched by her example, and I wanted to share my own feelings about this ‘art’ of letting go.
              
            I think that it is very common to assume that letting go of something is easy. I am sure that I am hearkening back to movies I have seen, such as Last Chance Charlie, where the protagonist lets go of his routine life in order to embrace love in his mid-life. These kinds of movies often glamorize a spontaneous decision to take a risk or change, without showing too much mental preparation that a person goes through to make that leap. But I am reminded that when Master Sheng Yen talks about the four steps in handling a problem (face it, accept it, deal with it, let it go), letting go is always the last step. But I also think that letting go is a prerequisite to the other steps as well. Without an attitude of let go,  a person would not likely even be able to face a problem. What one has to let go of is the habitual, protective self that wants to smooth over difficulties. For sure, letting go does not mean to let go of problems. This would be refusing to face those problems. It is letting go of that special attachment one has to the self and its roles.
                
           In my own life, I think that the most addictive and perhaps difficult thing to let go of is the comfort and security that comes from a relative feeling of success and mastery in one’s role. Once I have mastered a certain role at work or in a subject area, I am then inclined to think that my learning is finished, and I can coast on what I have learned. In doing so, I get stuck in a role that feels secure and comfortable. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, because secure roles are necessary to the fabric of work and even family life. But it starts to become problematic when I think that I am that role, or that I could not survive without that role. But is there any role that anybody has had since birth? Unless one is a Prince or born into royalty, perhaps not. Even these latter roles are continually changing. It’s sometimes important to realize that no role we have ever adopted stays the  same; it is subject to change and sometimes loss, even when one has the best intentions to uphold that role to the best of their abilities. Again, is this abnormal? In these situations, does one fret over what one has lost and then bemoan what they could have done better? While the latter is sometimes educative, more often it becomes a form of brow-beating, and it lowers one’s courage and self-esteem to go forward.
               
          Another assumption that under-girds attachment to roles is our sense that we are a well-oiled, high maintenance machine that absolutely requires certain specific comforts, and forms of respect, in order to function or thrive. I think this, again, comes from the privilege of having a role that is socially accepted and relatively stable, particularly in difficult or unstable times. But it overlooks the fact that we can also become resilient when times call for fewer things or a simpler life.  A philosophy and spiritual practice that emphasizes simplicity can help to see through the illusion that we need so many things to cope. What we actually need is a grounded sense that one is okay without too many things, and these ‘things’ are only the wandering thoughts of mind.
              
            I think one last thing to bear in mind is that failures are not devastating to a human being’s wellness. To ‘fail’ in some area or to overlook something that could have been done better is educative, but it doesn’t need to be humiliating to the point of feeling guilt or regret over it. Most of the time, failures cannot be attributed to any one single thing, and there are many layers of interpretation behind why one fails, or succeeds for that matter. It can be frightening to realize that one is not as ‘in control’ as life sometimes lulls one into believing. One somehow needs to realize that failure does not disable, it does not paralyze a person, and sometimes it can be transformative, even though it may seem incapacitating in a short term period.

                
           All of these principles seem to come from a meditative practice, because meditation pushes me to question what is ‘me’, and asks that I stop identifying this body as ‘me’. If I am not meditating, my consciousness is trying to find ways to defend and comfort my body, which I think is the end of me. Meditation helps me realize that I am more than my body, and I hope that this experience can help me when I sustain major losses in life.

No comments:

Post a Comment